Judicial Review in New Democracies :Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases

3.48 ( 29 Ratings by Goodreads)
Judicial Review in New Democracies

Judicial Review in New Democracies :Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases

(Author)
3.48 (29 Ratings by Goodreads)
paperback
Published: 23 July, 2003
Standard worldwide delivery by Tue, July 21 - Thu, July 30
Order within 0
Condition: NEW
$59.19
Price includes shipping
Available 20+ in stock
- +
FREE Returns within 30 days

Description

New democracies around the world have adopted constitutional courts to oversee the operation of democratic politics. Where does judicial power come from, how does it develop in the early stages of democratic liberalization, and what political conditions support its expansion? This book answers these questions through an examination of three constitutional courts in Asia: Taiwan, Korea, and Mongolia. In a region that has traditionally viewed law as a tool of authoritarian rulers, constitutional courts in these three societies are becoming a real constraint on government. In contrast with conventional culturalist accounts, this book argues that the design and functioning of constitutional review are largely a function of politics and interests. Judicial review - the power of judges to rule an act of a legislature or national leader unconstitutional - is a solution to the problem of uncertainty in constitutional design. By providing 'insurance' to prospective electoral losers, judicial review can facilitate democracy.
See more

More Details

Type Book
ISBN13 9780521520393
ISBN10 0521520398
Number Of Pages 312
Item Weight 426 g
Product Dimensions 152 x 228 x 23 mm
Publisher / Reseller Cambridge University Press
Format paperback
See More +

Media Reviews

"Every serious scholar and student of constitutional politics and institutional design should read this book." The Law and Politics Book Review
"Ginsburg provides compelling empirical support in his three East Asian cases that judicial power increases when political power is diffuse. Because he is interested in highlihgting the conditions under which courts can constrain other political actors, compliance is an important indicator of judicial independence." - Shannon Roesler, Law and Social Inquiry

Show more