When you buy a used copy YOU SAVE
Carbon Dioxide
1.66Kg of CO2
Water
208 litre(s) of Water
Tree
0.0125 Tree(s)
donate
1 book donated to global literacy projects

What's Wrong with the British Constitution?

4.00 ( 2 Ratings by Goodreads)
What's Wrong with the British Constitution?

What's Wrong with the British Constitution?

(Author)
4.00 (2 Ratings by Goodreads)
paperback
Published: 19 July, 2012
Standard worldwide delivery by Wed, August 5 - Mon, August 10
Order within 0
Condition: USED
$41.97
RRP $78.59
You save $36.62 (47%)
Price includes shipping
Available 1 in stock
- +
FREE Returns within 30 days

Description

In this provocative new study, Iain McLean argues that the traditional story of the British constitution does not make sense. It purports to be both positive and normative: that is, to describe both how people actually behave and how they ought to behave. In fact, it fails to do either; it is not a correct description and it has no persuasive force. The book goes on to offer a reasoned alternative. The position that still dominates the field of constitutional law is that of parliamentary sovereignty (or supremacy). According to this view, the supreme lawgiver in the United Kingdom is Parliament. Some writers in this tradition go on to insist that Parliament in turn derives its authority from the people, because the people elect Parliament. An obvious problem with this view is that Parliament, to a lawyer, comprises three houses: monarch, Lords, and Commons. The people elect only one of those three houses. This book aims to show, contrary to the prevailing view, that the UK exists by virtue of a constitutional contract between two previously independent states. Professor McLean argues that the work of the influential constitutional theorist A.V. Dicey has little to offer those who really want to understand the nature of the constitution. Instead, greater understanding can be gleaned from considering the 'veto plays' and 'credible threats' available to politicians since 1707. He suggests that the idea that the people are sovereign dates back to the 17th century (maybe the 14th in Scotland), but has gone underground in English constitutional writing. He goes on to show that devolution and the UK's relationship with the rest of Europe have taken the UK along a constitutionalist road since 1972, and perhaps since 1920. He concludes that no intellectually defensible case can be made for retaining an unelected house of Parliament, an unelected head of state, or an established church. The book will be essential reading for political scientists, constitutional lawyers, historians, and politicians alike.
Prizes

Winner of Winner of the 2011 W. J. M. Mackenzie Prize awarded by the Political Studies Association.

See more

More Details

Type Book
ISBN13 9780199656455
ISBN10 0199656452
Number Of Pages 416
Item Weight 640 g
Product Dimensions 155 x 233 x 24 mm
Publisher / Reseller Oxford University Press
Format paperback
See More +

Media Reviews

Over the last two decades political scientists have broadened their interest to include the constitution, and the result has been a number of informative books on the subject Ian McLean's new contribution is one of the, if not the, best of the lot. It combines enlightening history, careful empirical analysis, and provocative prescriptions this wise and thoughtful book that deserves careful attention from students of both British politics and comparative constitutions. * The British Politics Group newsletter, APSA *

Show more

GoodReads Reviews

Author's Bio

Iain McLean has previously worked at Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Warwick, and held visiting appointments at Washington & Lee, Stanford, Yale and Australian National Universities. He has written copiously about UK public policy; political history; and historical applications of rational choice theory. He is a Fellow of the British Academy and his previous two OUP books have been awarded the W. J. M. McKenzie Book Prize. He is Professor of Politics at Oxford University, and a fellow of Nuffield College.

Show more